Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+2881%
2.534 TFLOPS
GeForce 9650M GT
0.085 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Aug 2008
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
32
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
84.80 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
G96C
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GT
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.314 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
