Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1650MHz vs 1335MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.534 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+61%
4.101 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Apr 2019
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
96
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
TU116
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.6 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
