Home GPU Comparison Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 150% (1400MHz vs 560MHz)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU +4786%
2.15 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2010
HD Graphics-M
Generation
TeraScale IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
500 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
560 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.240 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.240 GTexel/s
4.301 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
RS880
-
GPU Variant
RS880M
Generation 12.2
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
-
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.181 billion
Unknown
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy