Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (2350MHz vs 1400MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
2.15 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+123%
4.813 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
1292
Arc 140T Mobile
+210%
4012
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
612
Arc 140T Mobile
+224%
1986
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
4.301 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
-
-
-
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
