Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 8324P
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 2676 v3 with 12 cores 2.4GHz and EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E5-2676 v3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 180W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2133)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 30MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 2676 v3
555
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+199%
1664
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 2676 v3
319
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+4084%
13349
General Parameters
Jun 2015
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
-
-
-
Haswell-EP
Core Architecture
Siena
-
-
-
Intel Socket 2011-3
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
2.6 billions
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
-
-
-
120 W
Power Consumption
180 W
-
-
-
-
-
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
356 mm²
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
-
-
-
CPU Performance
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.65 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12
Total Core Count
32
24
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
26.5
-
-
-
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
-
-
-
2
SMP
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
-
-
-
4
Max Memory Channels
6
-
-
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
AI Accelerator
-
-
-
-
-
-
Miscellaneous
-
-
-
3
PCIe Version
5
40
PCIe Lanes
96
-
-
-
-
