Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
7808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +1743%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro M520 Mobile
0.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2017
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.328 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.66 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
799.5 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy