Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
5312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
Boost Clock876MHz
Lower TDP (245W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +192%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla K40c
5.046 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
745 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
8192
Shading Units
2880
256
TMUs
240
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
245W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net