Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +274%
14.75 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2012
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
2688
256
TMUs
224
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
235W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy