CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
RTX A6000
+162%
38.71 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
NVIDIA RTX A6000
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2020
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
84
8192
Shading Units
10752
256
TMUs
336
128
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI6
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla M10
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla K80
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
Related News
1
AMD Unveils Future Plans: Introducing Zen7 Architecture and MI500 Series
2
AMD Set to Evenly Compete with Intel in the Server CPU Market
3
AMD Launches New Instinct MI350 AI Accelerator
4
NVIDIA Plans to Launch Next-Generation Rubin Accelerators in September
5
AMD Unveils New Zen5 Processor
6
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
7
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
8
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
9
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
10
Leaked Benchmark Data for AMD RX 9060XT Shows It Underperforming Compared to 5060Ti
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy