Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Boost Clock1354MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +964%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.66 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.33 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.66 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1386 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.33 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
40W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy