Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1291MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+395%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2019
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
8192
Shading Units
1152
256
TMUs
72
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
