Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
8096 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (154W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +6313%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
768MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
96
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
154W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy