Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
8176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M +31282%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy