Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2550MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
12032 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+2641%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Aug 2023
H3C Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
32GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
100
768
Shading Units
12800
48
TMUs
400
24
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
76.3 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
