Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 9070 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 304W)
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (2970MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 9070 XT
+1943%
48.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Mar 2025
H3C Graphics
Generation
Navi IV
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1660 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2970 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
380.2 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
760.3 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
97.32 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.66 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.521 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
304W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Navi 48
-
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
(215-176600315)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
Unknown
Transistors
53.9 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
