Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
+140%
5.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Apr 2014
H3C Graphics
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
500W
700 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Vesuvius
-
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.2 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3
