Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon 550
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM Radeon 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1550MHz vs 1183MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 56.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+96%
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon 550
1.211 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Apr 2017
H3C Graphics
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1100 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1183 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
56.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.93 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.86 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1211 GFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1211 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.71 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO
(215-0904018)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.2 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
