Intel H3C XG310 vs ATI FireMV 2250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jan 2007
H3C Graphics
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
32W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
RV516
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
R500
Intel
Foundry
UMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.107 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0
