Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1550MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 770
+39%
3.333 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
May 2013
H3C Graphics
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1046 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.72 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.9 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.333 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
230W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-425-A2
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
