Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (160W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
+98%
2.381 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Nov 2008
H3C Graphics
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
160W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.956 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
