Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310 +2876%
2.381 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
May 2010
H3C Graphics
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
80
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
M93
-
-
-
Generation 12.1
Architecture
TeraScale
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.242 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net