Home GPU Comparison Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1650MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (185W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +219%
7.603 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Nov 2020
Release Date
Feb 2021
H3C Graphics
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
185W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
10.8 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net