Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1785MHz vs 1550MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
+111%
5.027 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Feb 2021
H3C Graphics
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
1408
48
TMUs
88
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
125W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.6 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
