NVIDIA H200 NVL vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 141GB VRAM H200 NVL and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (141GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (2130MHz vs 1785MHz)
Lower TDP (70W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H200 NVL
+402%
60.32 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2024
Release Date
Feb 2024
Server Hopper
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1593 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
141GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
4.89TB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
132
SM Count
22
16896
Shading Units
2816
528
TMUs
88
24
ROPs
48
528
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
50 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
942.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
241.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
60.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
30.16 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
70W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GH100
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Hopper
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
80 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
814 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.7
