NVIDIA H200 NVL vs AMD FirePro R5000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 141GB VRAM H200 NVL and 2GB VRAM FirePro R5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro R5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H200 NVL
+4660%
60.32 TFLOPS
FirePro R5000
1.267 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2024
Release Date
Feb 2013
Server Hopper
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1593 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
141GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
256bit
4.89TB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
768
528
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
50 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
942.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
241.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
60.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
30.16 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
150W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GH100
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Hopper
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
80 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
814 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
