Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA H100 CNX vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA H100 CNX vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

AI GPU We compared a GPU: 80GB VRAM H100 CNX and a Professional market GPU: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA H100 CNX 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1845MHz vs 1545MHz)
More VRAM (80GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2039GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
12288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
H100 CNX +656%
53.84 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2018
Tesla Hopper
Generation
Quadro
AI GPU
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

690 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1845 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1593 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
5120bit
Memory Bus
256bit
2039GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

114
SM Count
36
-
Compute Units
-
14592
Shading Units
2304
456
TMUs
144
24
ROPs
64
456
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
50 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

44.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
841.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
215.4 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
53.84 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
26.92 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GH100
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Hopper
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
12 nm
80 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
814 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
160W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy