Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (260W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
12.86 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +7%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2021
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
7680
288
TMUs
240
96
ROPs
120
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
8 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy