NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1612MHz vs 1395MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16
+21%
9.999 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
20
3584
Shading Units
2560
224
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
48
448
Tensor Cores
80
56
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
60W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GA107S
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
754 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
