Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1404MHz vs 1395MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16 +155%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
1139 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
1792
288
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GP104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy