NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16
+703%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK106
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
