NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16
+360%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1536
224
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
122W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
