NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
3232 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 172W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16
+1284%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000 SDI
0.722 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
120.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
11
3584
Shading Units
352
224
TMUs
44
64
ROPs
40
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.29 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.57 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.3 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
361.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
172W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
2x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GF100
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
