NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2100MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 604.8GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16
9.999 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X
+1534%
163.4 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2023
GRID
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
19456
224
TMUs
880
64
ROPs
0
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
750W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
MI300
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
146 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
N/A
