NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16
+1983%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
4
3584
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
62W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GF106
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
