Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA H100 CNX

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA H100 CNX

AI GPU We compared a Professional market GPU: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and a GPU: 80GB VRAM H100 CNX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Lower TDP (260W vs 350W)
NVIDIA H100 CNX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1845MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (80GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2039GB/s vs 604.8GB/s)
9984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16
12.86 TFLOPS
H100 CNX +318%
53.84 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
GRID
Generation
Tesla Hopper
Professional
Type
AI GPU
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
690 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
80GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
2039GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
114
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
14592
288
TMUs
456
96
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
456
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.28 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
841.3 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
215.4 TFLOPS
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
53.84 TFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.92 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GH100
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
4 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
80 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
350W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
9.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy