NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M6 8Q
+362%
2.218 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
192
96
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
46.21 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
69.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
69.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
62W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GF106
GM204-995-A1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
