NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
+54%
1.672 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Jul 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
