NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Boost Clock1306MHz
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
+561%
11.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Jan 2021
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
6144
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
350W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5
