NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
592 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
+1448%
1.672 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Apr 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
640
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.1
