NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
+128%
1.672 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Mar 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
51W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
