Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Boost Clock1306MHz
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +782%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
GRID
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
8192
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy