NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Boost Clock1306MHz
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+782%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
GRID
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
8192
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
