Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA GRID K520 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520
2.289 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +503%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2021
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
7680
128
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy