Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA GRID K500 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K500 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K500 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K500 +395%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
108W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy