Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K340 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA GRID K340 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K340 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K340 +52%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Oct 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
62W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net