Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K340 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA GRID K340 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K340 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (51W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K340
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
51W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net