CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
VS
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI8 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI8 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI8
+257%
8.192 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
VS
AMD Radeon Instinct MI8
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Dec 2016
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
175W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
2
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
3
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla X2070
4
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
5
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla S870
6
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
7
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
8
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900
9
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
10
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
Related News
1
NVIDIA Plans to Launch Next-Generation Rubin Accelerators in September
2
AMD Unveils New Zen5 Processor
3
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
4
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
5
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
6
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
7
Leaked Benchmark Data for AMD RX 9060XT Shows It Underperforming Compared to 5060Ti
8
Intel Launches the All-New Core Ultra 200 Series Processors
9
Intel Unveils Three New Xeon 6 Processors
10
AMD Officially Launches the Zen5 Series Threadripper
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy