NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
+1330%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1536
Shading Units
64
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
