NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000
+451%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2016
GRID
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1536
Shading Units
3840
128
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
