NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+29%
2.974 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2019
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
1536
Shading Units
1152
128
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
