NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1557MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
+91%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2017
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1329 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
1536
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
40W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GP107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
